Doreen Adengo V Priscilla Namwanje H.C.C.A No. 123 of 2019.
Ms. Doreen Adengo being aggrieved by the decision of the Architects Disciplinary Committee directing her to pay compensation to Ms. Priscilla Namwanje and a fine of one million shillings...
5 REASONS TO TRADEMARK YOUR BUSINESS NAME AND LOGO
The media has recently had a share of national conversation concerning two companies that provide funeral services in Uganda...
DOREEN ADENGO V PRISCILLA NAMWANJE
Ms. Doreen Adengo being aggrieved by the decision of the Architects Disciplinary Committee directing her to pay
compensation to Ms. Priscilla Namwanje and a fine of one millions hillings only for professional misconduct...
COVID-19: THE DILEMMA OF EMPLOYMENT IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR.
Ever since the emergence of COVID-19 as a pandemic, the world has witnessed extensive lockdowns and a call for people to stay...
LAKE VICTORIA POLLUTION: MUST WE CARE?
A while back, a Ugandan newspaper published the harrowing findings of a research project commissioned by Nation Media Journalists from Kenya and Uganda accompanied by scientists from..
VIVO ENERGY WINS CASE AGAINST URA AS COURT CONFIRMS RENT PAID IN RESPECT OF LEASES AS AN ALLOWABLE DEDUCTION
This article focuses on the recent decision of the commercial court following an appeal by Vivo Energy against URA
IMAGE RIGHTS IN UGANDA
In April, 2019, Ugandan jetsetter and celebrity, Sheila Gashumba, was engraved in a bitter fight with La Paronis, the hottest Kampala Sunday Hangout, ....
7 REASONS TO SETTLE YOUR CASE AT MEDIATION
In this article, I make a case for settling a dispute at the mediation level. I demonstrate the immense benefits offered by mediation over a formal court hearing before a judicial officer.
TAX ALERT: THE COURT OF APPEAL FINDS URA’S IMPOSITION OF INTEREST PENDING DISPUTE RESOLUTION UNTENABLE IN LAW.
On the 12th day of November, 2019, the Court of Appeal Justices Kenneth Kakuru JA, Ezekiel Muhanguzi JA, and Christopher Madrama JA in the case of Airtel Uganda Ltd v Uganda Revenue Authority; Civil Appeal No. 40 of 2013 delivered a landmark decision against the imposition of Penalty/Interest for the period covering objection proceedings and/or appeals.
In this Article I make an analysis of the said decision.